Serving Greater Vancouver & the Fraser Valley
Towards an intercultural ecclesiology

Towards an intercultural ecclesiology

by Sherman Lau, MA


I love the church. I pastored two churches and worked at two seminaries preparing Christian men and women for service in congregational ministry. It is indeed a privilege to preach and teach from God’s Word, bring comfort to the sick, mentor volunteers or feed the hungry. These acts form the basis of Christian ministry. However, a survey conducted in 2017 by Missions Fest Vancouver revealed that churches in the Lower Mainland were predominantly homogeneous consisting of a Caucasian majority, led by a senior pastor of the same ethnic persuasion. Some of these churches described themselves as multicultural congregations as their faith community also included minority ethnic groups. The survey also revealed that the largest faith communities were not homogeneously Caucasian, but were Chinese, Korean or Filipino congregations. The development of these congregations is safely assumed to be attributed to immigration in recent years, creating diaspora communities in Canada.

This trend is not unique to Canada. Other Western nations are also experiencing the effects of global immigration. What sets Canada apart is our value of multiculturalism that espouses a tolerance for all peoples regardless of race, ethnicity, or belief, protected by the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. However, I have observed that this value either translates into a silo effect of segregated congregations or faith communities who are multi-coloured but for whom global Christians are exempt from contributing to the life and leadership of these established churches.

I believe this is a unique time in Canada’s history when a paradigm shift is required for the Canadian Church to ensure its sustainability and vitality. We live in an era where there are more Christian believers in the Majority World than all the Western countries combined. Canada is a preferred country and we have an opportunity to embrace our global brothers and sisters in Christ to build a new type of church that is not drawn along ethnic lines. Imagine the Church of Canada as a leader of intercultural unity of the Christian faith if we move towards an intercultural ecclesiology.

David Livermore states in Cultural Intelligence: Improving Your CQ to Engage our Multicultural World, “Our goal is not simply to learn more about different cultures, nor is it just to become better at navigating cultural differences. We must actually become multicultural people so that we might better express love cross-culturally.”

In this statement, the “our” is about disciples of Christ who form the local church wherever it is located or planted. Livermore presents the argument that modern business organizations have long recognized the value in developing the cultural quotient (CQ) among their employees to be effective in a globalized economy. By the same token, Christian churches also have the opportunity to impact their increasingly diversifying neighbourhoods by increasing their CQ.

The basis for this assertion lies in my interpretation and understanding of New Testament narratives found in Acts 1:1-35, Galatians 3:26-29 and Revelation 7:9. I believe these verses reveal the heart of God for the nations to worship Him together as one body, rather than being segregated by ethnicity, class, or social status. Particularly in Revelation 7:9, the nations are pictured in God’s presence praising Him. We live in a time where prejudice, segregation and racism exist despite multicultural policies which are supposed to support a peaceful society. I would submit the argument that the Church would be more of a testimony of God’s power to change hearts if all Christians united by one faith, one baptism and one Spirit would transcend these human tendencies and be a living testimony of John 13:35. A world that only sees division and segregation in the church would instead see a people overcome by Jesus’ love and sacrifice.

Here are three reasons to consider an intercultural ecclesiology. First, a move towards an intercultural ecclesiology is based on the changing demographics of our neighbourhoods in Canada due to increased global immigration over the last fifty years. It is projected that by 2030, one in two adults will have been born in a country other than Canada. This brief survey of immigration trends serves to highlight the reality that Canada’s population is undergoing a major international transformation.

Second, we the church have an opportunity to be an example of true integration in Canadian society as well as to the global Christian community.

The problem lies with the inability or unwillingness to integrate the diverse nationalities into one body side by side. An intercultural mandate encourages dialogue and learning whereby we recognize our differences, yet make something new that incorporates the values and practices of each represented group.

Third, I am advocating an intercultural ecclesiology for our children and youth. They are growing up in a multicultural Canada, where their classmates and teachers are from all corners of the earth. Our workplaces also advocate diversity and we are bombarded by messages that to be Canadian is to be inclusive of all peoples regardless of race, gender or socio-economic status. Is the church as inclusive as the rest of our social groups or is it homogeneous? This disconnect contrasts with the God whom they are told is a God of all nations, yet His people do not worship or live the Christian life together. What message are we sending to our next generation?

To move us towards an intercultural ecclesiology, we must humble ourselves and analyze our cultural blind spots. Perhaps we need to increase our cultural intelligence and conduct a self-analysis of our biases and assumptions. But all this activity would be for nought if we do not believe and uphold Jesus’ command to love one another, as we love ourselves.

Missions Fest and Mission Central inspire and challenge people to participate in mission. For further conversations on Interculturalism, Sherman Lau can be found at Outreach Canada.

Related Posts

  • fvinclusionhound
    5 months ago

    I think we also need to begin by admitting many of our Churches appear to be outright racist. It would be great to have an honest explanation as to why “Chinese” Churches are labelled as such, yet Churches for Mennonites and Dutch are labelled as “community” Churches? Also, in Churches with very Chinese neighbourhoods, like Willingdon, how do we have boards of elders with all European Mennonites? Who is holding the power? Why are they still holding the power? Our children are not stupid–they will go to Sunday school and come home saying, “Wow, well, that was weird”–if they are overdosed in a Mennonite/Dutch worldview that is all too pervasive through the Lower Mainland. And yes, public schools, public universities, and public workplaces are doing this far better than the Church. Most Churches are just culture clubs that have very little to do with Christ. Christ is secondary, culture is primary.

Leave a Comment

Spotlight Articles: Schools, Camps, Missions and more

Family FUN